American Imperialism Essay -- Nongovernmental Oganizations

To use the title multinational American (Grewal, 2005) might be more politically correct than American imperialism but I contend that one is in fact an element of the other. The two readings for this week converge around the discussion of transnationalism and neoliberalism although in around different ways. Grewal (2005) discusses transnationalism in relation to the United States and its cultural, social, political and economic form on other nation-states specifically through technologies, bio government and geopolitics. Grewal presents interesting arguments to support the discern that the construction of human rights activism since the 1960s was a geopolitical strategy employ by the United States to extend its imperialist grasp on the international world. Grewal (2005) posits that the development of the feminist and womens rights movements were born out of human rights treat that quickly became transnational instruments of technologies of governmentality, creating and applyi ng knowledges and techniques that promote offbeat and security, rather than just the rights of populations (Grewal 2005122).The let of Nongovernmental Organization (NGO) came out of a desire to move women vulnerable populations from the margins to the center by questioning the most fundamental concepts of our social order so that they contributeress better account of womens lives (Grewal 2005126). In the process human rights issues became get hitched with to womens rights, social justice and later on to development. NGOs at the m of its inception were seen as politically autonomous entity that would intervene to ensure the welfare of female populations, the inefficiency of the state, and its ideology of patriarchy (Grewal 2005127). But cultural, socio-political... ...loitation, the US maintains its embargo on Cuba and continues to police movements across its borders only the future knows how the current anti-immigration sentiments might crane and materialize. Space does non permit an elaborate discussion about the politics of the United Nations, the World Bank or the IMF, but as a parenthetical note, these are also examples of an imperial or should I ordinate transnational apparatuses taken advantage of the by the United States. In the last-place analysis, I concur with Comaroff and Comaroff (2001) that relationship between the nation-state and millennial capitalismis not synonymous with globalism, although globalization is and inherent part of it but I would add more specifically that globalization like its predecessor colonalization, imperialization and now neoliberalism is a capitalist apparatus (Comaroff & Comaroff, 200134)